795 defined networks “as a set of nodes and the set of ties representing some relationship, or lack of relationship, between the nodes”. , for example, used a classification according to internal and external factors, while Larson analyzed the factors according to the different stages of development of the ties. In addition, the categorization of the identified factors consisted of different constructions. This is because, as Johannisson and Mønsted noted, entrepreneurs who acted on the interorganizational level as representatives of their startup still influenced all decisions and actions of the startup by their personal intention and conviction. Even though these three levels could be defined separately, it has been difficult in entrepreneurial research to examine them independently. Furthermore, networks were investigated on different levels defined as interpersonal, interunit, or interorganizational networks. Additionally, the factors of network change have also been investigated by observing the egocentric network of one firm, since changes within this network also affected changes in the overall network of an industry. elaborated influential factors on changes of the overall network of one industry. Besides these resources, which served as a factor for network changes, additional factors have only been researched in a very fragmented manner and through varying network perspectives. Since Aldrich and Zimmer, the observation of networks has developed from static approaches to dynamic ones because scholars considered that this matches the characteristics of startups as their needs for various resources, like technological capability or investments, are constantly changing. Networks have received increasing attention as contributors to sustainable entrepreneurial success since they benefit entrepreneurial capacity in terms of finances, technologies, marketing, and social aspects.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |